<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;The Evolution of Morality&#8221; and Innate Human Behavior</title>
	<atom:link href="http://helian.net/blog/2010/01/26/morality/the-evolution-of-morality-and-innate-human-behavior/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://helian.net/blog/2010/01/26/morality/the-evolution-of-morality-and-innate-human-behavior/</link>
	<description>The world as I see it</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 12:54:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin0</title>
		<link>http://helian.net/blog/2010/01/26/morality/the-evolution-of-morality-and-innate-human-behavior/comment-page-1/#comment-645</link>
		<dc:creator>admin0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 11:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://helian.net/blog/?p=1108#comment-645</guid>
		<description>I have still never seen a refutation of Dart&#039;s hypothesis, mentioned in Ardrey&#039;s &quot;African Genesis,&quot; that Australopithecines in southern Africa were hunters, based on statistical analysis of bone remains.  Montagu, et.al., couldn&#039;t even discuss the &quot;hunting hypothesis&quot; without accusing its proponents of some right wing political sin, even long after fire-hardened spears had been found at Homo Erectus sites.  We&#039;ve made astounding progress since Ardrey&#039;s day, with neuroscientists leading the way, and the psychologists and and sociologists dragged along kicking and screaming in their dust.  I am confident that eventually we will be able to demonstrate the association of innate behavioral traits with a hunting lifestyle down to the last molecule in the brain, if no one gets in their way.  A decade after we do, there will probably still be programs on Public TV &quot;proving&quot; that we were pure scavengers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have still never seen a refutation of Dart&#8217;s hypothesis, mentioned in Ardrey&#8217;s &#8220;African Genesis,&#8221; that Australopithecines in southern Africa were hunters, based on statistical analysis of bone remains.  Montagu, et.al., couldn&#8217;t even discuss the &#8220;hunting hypothesis&#8221; without accusing its proponents of some right wing political sin, even long after fire-hardened spears had been found at Homo Erectus sites.  We&#8217;ve made astounding progress since Ardrey&#8217;s day, with neuroscientists leading the way, and the psychologists and and sociologists dragged along kicking and screaming in their dust.  I am confident that eventually we will be able to demonstrate the association of innate behavioral traits with a hunting lifestyle down to the last molecule in the brain, if no one gets in their way.  A decade after we do, there will probably still be programs on Public TV &#8220;proving&#8221; that we were pure scavengers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Hetherington</title>
		<link>http://helian.net/blog/2010/01/26/morality/the-evolution-of-morality-and-innate-human-behavior/comment-page-1/#comment-644</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Hetherington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 05:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://helian.net/blog/?p=1108#comment-644</guid>
		<description>The Archaeology beards with their patched-elbow jackets just don&#039;t want to admit that man is a predator whose natural instinct is to kill with a weapon.  How could they earn a living at liberal arts colleges if they were compelled to replace  &quot;tool-making&quot; with &quot;weapon development&quot;.  
    They share the same building  with the Sociology and Psychology departments, whose methodology mimics  Chemistry and Biology,  but can never match the natural sciences in scientific exactitude.  There is no equivalent in  the pseudo-sciences for water  freezes at 32 degrees, or man evolved by enlarging his brain with protein.
    Robert Ardrey emphasized Raymond Dart’s work in the field. Dart had to live through a 40-year period before Piltdown Man was repudiated as a fraud, and the educated world thought Man originated in Asia.  He coined Australopithecine, but endured derision as the creator of the “Killer Ape Theory.”  Amity-Enmity is almost a misnomer because the critics ignore the amity that enables the enmity between groups. 
    I have  Time-Life Books’ The First Man  from 1973, complete with cute photo-illustrations of European-looking people,  that skirts the fundamental  issue and is indicative of the angst of the  collective social studies community, notably  Ashley Montagu.  Was a bowl and spoon ever found that predates the club or sharpened rock?  
    If the seminal moment when  ape became man, the “I think, therefore I am”  instant depicted by Stanley Kubrick in 2001 , happened some other way, I am  anxious to hear it.  
    Freud and his  best friend married each other&#039;s sister and the two couples spent most of their social time together.  After we rethink the carbon-based nature of man we can rethink the Oedipus complex because the “scientific” results were tainted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Archaeology beards with their patched-elbow jackets just don&#8217;t want to admit that man is a predator whose natural instinct is to kill with a weapon.  How could they earn a living at liberal arts colleges if they were compelled to replace  &#8220;tool-making&#8221; with &#8220;weapon development&#8221;.<br />
    They share the same building  with the Sociology and Psychology departments, whose methodology mimics  Chemistry and Biology,  but can never match the natural sciences in scientific exactitude.  There is no equivalent in  the pseudo-sciences for water  freezes at 32 degrees, or man evolved by enlarging his brain with protein.<br />
    Robert Ardrey emphasized Raymond Dart’s work in the field. Dart had to live through a 40-year period before Piltdown Man was repudiated as a fraud, and the educated world thought Man originated in Asia.  He coined Australopithecine, but endured derision as the creator of the “Killer Ape Theory.”  Amity-Enmity is almost a misnomer because the critics ignore the amity that enables the enmity between groups.<br />
    I have  Time-Life Books’ The First Man  from 1973, complete with cute photo-illustrations of European-looking people,  that skirts the fundamental  issue and is indicative of the angst of the  collective social studies community, notably  Ashley Montagu.  Was a bowl and spoon ever found that predates the club or sharpened rock?<br />
    If the seminal moment when  ape became man, the “I think, therefore I am”  instant depicted by Stanley Kubrick in 2001 , happened some other way, I am  anxious to hear it.<br />
    Freud and his  best friend married each other&#8217;s sister and the two couples spent most of their social time together.  After we rethink the carbon-based nature of man we can rethink the Oedipus complex because the “scientific” results were tainted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

